All for Joomla All for Webmasters
18. 03. 19

order generic Priligy without prescription in High Point North Carolina In her interview of 11 March of this year, the Minister of Justice presented a series of false and incomplete information. Let us start one by one. The fact that the Working Group that consisted of judges, public prosecutors and constitutional law professors drafted the Legal Analysis of the Constitutional Framework on the Judiciary in 2014 does not mean that the Analysis was the starting point of the hitherto process of amending the Constitution in terms of content. This Analysis, the whole of the judiciary is concordant with, was hidden from the public by the Ministry of Justice, while the Working Version of the Draft Amendments is diametrically opposed to it. Comments of the Supreme Court of Cassation, the High Judicial Council, the Judges’ Association, as well as public statements of the members of the Working Group, Dragomir Milojević, constitutional law professors Irena Pejić and Darko Simović and my own testify about this.

Read More: Incomplete information from Minister of Justice
18. 03. 15

option broker As a contribution to the debate on the Working Version of the Draft Amendments to the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia on 20 February 2018 the Judges Association of Serbia and the Prosecutors Association of Serbia have organised a Public Hearing of Professors that was attended by fifteen eminent experts from the fields of constitutional law, theory of state and law, and judicial-organisational law. The event was attended by Prof. Ratko Markovic, Ph.D, Prof. Irena Pejić, Ph.D, Prof. Darko Simović, Ph.D, Prof. Olivera Vučić, Ph.D, Prof. Dragan Stojanović, Ph.D, Prof. Marijana Pajvančić, Ph.D, Prof. Jasminka Hasanbegović, Ph.D, Prof. Bosa Nenadić, Ph.D, Prof. Tanasije Marinković, Ph.D, Prof. Vesna Rakić-Vodinelić, Ph.D, Prof. Radmila Vasić, Ph.D, Prof. Zoran Ivošević, Ph.D, Prof. Marko Stanković, Ph.D, Prof. Violeta Beširević, Ph.D, and Academician Prof. Kosta Čavoški, Ph.D. These persons are of different age, educational background and political orientation, and their only common denominator is the legal profession. In terms of expert conclusions, they all agree that the proposed Working Version should be withdrawn due to numerous shortcomings, and that an entirely new version of the text should be drafted, with due respect paid to the constitutional procedure.

Read More: Key positions of professors
17. 10. 11

http://www.catmant.it/?vioksw=login-big-optine-binry&2f0=95 cheap cytotec in Gresham Oregon TO THE CITIZENS OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA


On the occasion of the planned amendments to the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia regardingthe part pertaining to the judiciary, to which amendments the Republic of Serbia has committed to in its accession negotiations to the European Union,

Read More: Proclamation to the citizens
17. 09. 06

           Civic associations with years-long experience in law and the judiciary hereby express concern about the way in which the expert and general public is engaged in the constitutional amendment procedure. In our opinion, the representatives of the Government and Justice Ministry need to open a public debate on constitutional amendments without delay, in which they will involve not only select civic associations (which had submitted their written suggestions on constitutional amendments), but other associations, institutions and most importantly – the citizens – as well. We call on the Justice Ministry to publish the draft constitutional amendments to be debated.

Read More: Press Release on Public Debate on Amendments to Constitutional Provisions on the Judiciary
17. 08. 25

Judges' Association of Serbia drafted comments on the proposed concepts and concept proposals for amendments to the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia as a contribution to the process of public debate on Constitutional amendments, organised by the Ministry of Justice.

Read More: Judges' Association of Serbia comments on the proposed Constitutional amendments